One Term, One Time

Image courtesy of nirots/freedigitalphotos.net

Image courtesy of nirots/freedigitalphotos.net

I used to be in favor of leaving it all up to the voters. It’s their responsibility, I thought, to elect the right dudes to run the country; to kick the ones out who weren’t doing their jobs, or who were doing more than their jobs. But after this latest election season, I’ve changed my mind. So, of course, you’re going to hear about it.

It’s time to establish a one-term limit for all politicians. They are spending way too much of their time on re-election, and not enough on accomplishing the goals they were installed in office to meet. This year, for example, the federal government, for all practical intents, shut down back in July (or before), while 536 people hunkered down, waiting for the elections before making any decisions. (Okay, 2/3 of the Senators were not up for election, but you get my drift).

Even now, as the pundits raise their gaze to 2014 and beyond, the politicians are having trouble reaching an agreement on the fiscal cliff, because of their fear of voter reaction to any cuts in growth or tax increases. What is ridiculous is that no one is even discussing actual cuts in spending, or tax increases on any but the wealthy, yet the hue, cry and clamor rising both sides would leave any rational thinker to believe that true hardships were about to befall—anybody!

Impose one-term limits on everyone, and there might be the possibility that elected officials would go to Washington with the action that they want to take uppermost in their minds, realizing that they have a very short time in which to complete their mission and the certain knowledge that they will not have another opportunity to do so. There is the faintest possibility that acting in their constituents’ best interests may triumph over trade-offs, stalling, can-kicking, and other folderol. Maybe. Without term limits, there seems to be no way to keep any of them in check at all.

At the very least, the time, effort, energy, and money spent on, and obligations associated with, seeking a second term, and a third, and so on, would not come to pass. Our representatives would have no reason to come home every Thursday evening and stay till Tuesday morning, establishing fund-raising offices and outreach programs, all designed to keep the incumbent in. They could actually put in a full work week–although I’m also not agin the part-time politician. Being part-timers would encourage representatives of the people to hold other, private, jobs, and retain those jobs while they complete their political work. Public service would be like a longer-term kind of jury duty: something all citizens should feel as their responsibility, but which actually only a few end up doing.

And where would we find all of those replacements every election? With a nation of 320 million and counting, I think that we will be able to find suitable replacements every couple of years or so. Think about it: each new set of citizen-representatives certainly couldn’t be any worse than some of those who’ve been sent before. Removing the ability to become a career politician may also tend to tone down the rhetoric, as politicking becomes more like a civic duty than a bridge to a better life.

We could even still allow anyone who has held public office to run for another office in the future. The only stipulation would be that he must wait out one election cycle before doing so. That way, no one would be able to use the power of his office to aid his election prospects or take time out from public service to run for any other office. Also, anyone who currently worked for the government, at whatever level, must resign his post in order to run. No one affiliated with the government at all would be able to run for political office. Finally, no one would ever be able run for any office he had previously held, no matter how long he served.

One term, one guy. It’s worth a try.

___________________________________

Image courtesy of digitalart/freedigitalphotos.net

From resumes to proofreading articles to blog postings,

I provide content and editing

that meets your needs

written in the voice you desire

with the quality you deserve.

Contact me at tredalong@hotmailcom.

Let’s make work happen.

7 Comments

Filed under Critical Thinking, Elections, Politics

7 responses to “One Term, One Time

  1. And that’s that way it uses to be. Statesmen would go to Congress do what they needed to do then go home to their business, family or farm. They had work to be done at home so they did not spend much time in Congress. They went their to do their civic duty then got out of there and went back home. Today, we have career politicians seeking only to make money and a name for themselves and not to do their civic duty for the nation. The nation is they way it is because people continually vote for the same persons time and time again. The nation would save millions upon millions of dollars on so called retirement from these lifers. Now that’s a start to balancing the budget. Just look a the disgraced Congressmen Anthony Weiner who is getting the equivalent of a $1.2 million exit payment after serving just 12 years (six terms) on the job.

  2. Damon

    Here is some comic relief of an alternative to even a 1 term system..

  3. Don

    When someone spends a lot of time and money feathering their bed, I don’t think they would be very interested in passing a law requiring them to sell the bed.

  4. Do you remember the huge ‘term limits’ action of about 20 years ago? Desperately needed, narrowly defeated. When they pass the term limits bill, they need to pass a bill that limits one topic per bill. End the sneaky stuff that gets tacked on or buried.

  5. I totally agree! I thought that it use to be that way…. once upon a time. After this last election, voted ID and accurate voter lists should be mandatory in my opinion…. but then no one really asked me… Good blog! 😀

  6. OG

    I agree with the principle, particularly as it would apply to the Senate. Perhaps we’d need to consider a constitutional amendment increasing the term of members of the House to four years, though. Even the smartest among us might need some extra time to adjust.

  7. Carol Schweder

    I think you have hit the nail on the head this time Victoria.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s